![]() The customization can cut back on time-wasting clicks, and let you work on what you really need. While other programs might require several button clicks & menus for basic tasks, Ableton Live can quickly access Automation and Quantization with a few keystrokes.Īll of these features make Ableton Live a very efficient program to work with. There is plenty of user customization custom shortcuts, color-coding, custom menus, and complete control of MIDI mappings are all core functions of Ableton Live. There are very few external windows that bog down your view of the session, and most of what you need can be quickly accessed in a list. Let’s compare some of the strengths and drawbacks of each program, and then figure out which DAW will best suit your needs.Ībleton Live is widely praised for its minimal visual layout, plug-and-play ability, and unique interface. No matter the DAW, it is your skill, expertise and musical ear that have the biggest impact on the quality of the files that you export from your computer. That said, both programs are extremely effective tools for audio engineers and musicians. This also means that there are some functions that are a breeze in one program, but very frustrating or impossible in the other. However, while both Pro Tools and Ableton can essentially do the same thing, there are certain tasks each program was specifically designed to do well. I suggest that you play around with the various parameters and setups, noting what you did and what was the outcome, until you find the combinations that work for you.Both Ableton and Pro Tools are powerful, upper-level audio editing programs that work with MIDI, manipulate audio clips, host plugins, and export in a variety of formats. Alternatively, setting the record parameter to mono records the mic coming from one channel onto 2 channels in MMM. But, I, or the musicians, can monitor the sound on the other tracks (from MMM on the computer) through the headphones. The mic can be recorded to one channel only, if the recording parameter is set to stereo. That said, I can record voice and something else, usually a guitar, simultaneously using the mixer because there are 2 ports, one for each channel of one track. Monitoring would still be done through the M-Track interface. If I used a mixer, it would be upstream of the interface and connected to the line in on the mixer. When I record (to a separate track) anything that is played while recording (from the computer on other tracks) comes back through my headphones. When I record, there is a mix - USB and Direct, that I monitor through headphones connected to the M-Track. ![]() ![]() I monitor through the M-Track monitor, not the computer. I use an M-Audio M-Track two-channel USB auidio/midi interface to connect to the computer. If not, then you have a different problem. If so, you have to monitor through the mixer/audio interface what comes back from the USB and what is going to the computer (Direct). My understanding is that you are using an external mixer, with USB for the mic input. Then you can record your voice to a separate track. You first have to record the instruments - one at a time. See the last sentence in the answer from Nihan94 - you can only record one track at a time.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |